£450 million approved for over 11,700 new and affordable homes
The Homes and Communities Agency today confirmed that it has finished a thorough assessment of the 270 stalled housing schemes shortlisted to receive funding under the Kickstart Programme. A total of 91 schemes have been approved for funding, with another 63 approved subject to conditions being met or requiring further consideration.
As a result £207 million will now be allocated to directly fund 6,618 new and affordable homes. A further £241 million could be allocated for 5,144 homes, to those schemes which have been approved subject to conditions.
Eighty-one schemes were either withdrawn by the developer because of the need to complete homes by March 2011, or because they no longer felt the need for public sector support. Of those which were withdrawn, over half have been resubmitted for funding under Kickstart Round 2, where the timescale for the completion of homes is longer.
Thirty-five schemes were not approved for funding as they did not meet the HCA’s robust criteria for the Programme, particularly on design and value for money grounds.
Chief executive of the HCA, Sir Bob Kerslake said: “I am delighted that the HCA has been able to play such a major role in unlocking key housing schemes across the country.
“The due diligence process has been a thorough and challenging one for all involved but I am pleased that so many good schemes have been confirmed. We now look forward to completing the contracts and getting starts on site.”
Funding has been allocated to schemes in every English region, including 22 in the West Midlands and 16 in the South West; and 77 of the approved schemes will offer apprenticeships or local labour initiatives. In total an employment dividend of around 1,300 apprenticeships or local labour initiatives could potentially be achieved through the Kickstart Programme as a whole.
The HCA has also confirmed that it has received over 660 bids for funding under Kickstart Round 2. These schemes, which could unlock up to 55,000 homes, will now be subject to the same level of scrutiny as the successful schemes under Round 1.
Thursday, 29, Oct 2009 10:03
By politics.co.uk staff
The government’s chief drug advisor has gone to war against the Home Office, in the latest episode of a simmering row between experts and the government.
Professor David Nutt, of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, said cannabis did not cause major health problems and should have remained a class C drug.
He also repeated previous comments about ecstasy – that it is less dangerous than riding a horse – and said those who wished for the drug to be downgraded to class B had already won the argument.
In a wide ranging attack, he also said former home secretary Jacqui Smith “devalued” the concept of scientific research. The comment is a reference to the government’s decision to return cannabis to class B status despite all the medical and official advice pointing against it.
Comment: Lying to kids is the first lesson of politics
The Home Office has distanced itself from his views.
Prof Nutt took aim at the way the debate around the reclassification of cannabis had centred on its ability to prompt schizophrenic episodes in some users.
But he claimed the risk was low, and that despite wide usage of the higher strength cannabis for over a decade there had been no discernable upswing in schizophrenic episodes.
He also quoted research which “estimates that, to prevent one episode of schizophrenia, we would need to stop about 5,000 men aged 20 to 25 years from ever using the drug”.
Prof Nutt said: “We have to accept young people like to experiment – with drugs and other potentially harmful activities – and what we should be doing in all of this is to protect them from harm at this stage of their lives.
“We therefore have to provide more accurate and credible information. If you think that scaring kids will stop them using, you are probably wrong.”
Prof Nutt made the comments during a lecture at King College.
Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Chris Huhne welcomed his comments.
“Professor Nutt is right to suggest that there needs to be a full and frank debate about drug abuse without resorting to moral hysteria,” he said.
“The best way to reduce the harm drugs cause to society is to base policy on facts, not as a method of political posturing.”