It’s a Load of old people who have had their free swimming cut. Not happy bunnies!! my answer vote out the people who put in the cuts.
Daily Archives: July 13, 2010
How disgusting is this to drunk to vote, the Tories at work?
I was too drunk to vote on Budget, confesses Tories’ Mr Reckless (or should that be Legless?)source the Mail
By Simon Walters
Last updated at 9:50 AM on 11th July 2010
Under the influence: Mark Reckless was said to have fallen asleep after his drinking session on the Commons terrace
A shamed Tory MP has admitted he was too drunk to vote in the debate on the Budget after a night of debauched behaviour on the Commons terrace.
Former banker Mark Reckless was so inebriated that he fell to the floor of a Commons bar before the crucial vote in the early hours of the morning, before being bundled into a taxi home by fellow MPs.
Conservative chiefs also apologised after another MP, Sheryll Murray, was allegedly rude to a parliamentary official after she, too, had been drinking on the terrace overlooking the Thames.
The extraordinary scenes came during a six-hour drinking session that lasted until 2.30am on Wednesday, involving dozens of MPs and their aides.
Commons bars took a record £5,000 during the evening as taxpayer-subsidised Pimm’s, wine, beer and champagne flowed.
Witnesses said a ‘significant number’ of MPs who took part in the Budget vote were either drunk or under the influence of alcohol.
‘It was disgusting,’ said a female MP. ‘The chamber and the voting lobbies stank of booze and sweat.
What a day.
Out with Barry putting out leaflets,and some guy came out giving us a load of verbal s.
“ what a waste of time it was voting bleeding Liberal Democrat” Well on the good side we only need a few hundred more, and the way the winds blowing who knows?
Can’t you imagine Bill Hinds reading this and saying ” Thank Christ for that”
Strange word dilettante the first time i heard it was when i very well known local councillor used it to insult one individual in council. Perhaps he can freely use the Plural next week without concern?
Noun
|
Singular |
Plural |
dilettante (plural dilettanti or (rarely) dilettantes)
- An amateur, someone who dabbles in a field out of casual interest rather than as a profession or serious interest.
- A person with a general but superficial interest in any art or a branch of knowledge. (Sometimes derogatory.)e
I have taken this off the site the Tory liberal party have set up to ask you how to save money.
Dhttp://spendingchallenge.hm-treasury.gov.uk
- Info
by markpaulwoodhouse on July 13, 2010 at 04:23AM
Over 50 years of the Welfare State has seen this nation decline from world superpower to a laughing stock. Prior to the Second World War, Britain was respected across the globe and the populace were literate, polite and knew their place. There is an obvious link between this nation’s decline and the ever increasing welfare burden.
All welfare spending should cease immediately and the money saved diverted to the military in order to build a significant nuclear arsenal that the French and communists don’t snigger at.
Once the new arsenal is established, diplomats can be withdrawn from other countries and the UN. We could then make it clear to any nation that thinks it’s hard enough that we don’t negotiate. This strategy would need to have credence, so it would be important to pick a fight wth a small nation (say Belgium) at the outset, in order to demonstrate our resolve and capabilities.
The withdrawal of diplomats would stop global warming caused by the aluminium foil found on Ferrero Rocher. The reversal in climate change would prevent seagulls becoming the size of small aircraft, probably.
How the idea could be implemented
- Instead of receiving child benefit, parents will receive a letter detailing the yield and serial number of an individual war head. Multiple independant re-entry vehicle warheads could be reseved for people who are the parents to multiple births. Parents will then name the warhead/MIRV after their child. This would discourage left wing people from having children.
- Provision of healthcare would be provided by the military on a basis of need. This will put a stop to liposuction, breast enlargements brazilians and botox type treatments on the NHS. Nurses uniforms would be restyled like american nurses in the 1940′s, they wouldn’t be mingers and they would sing a lot as seen in that shampoo advert.
- Similarly, education would be provided by the military. This would be limited to the provision of subjects that support the military-industrial complex i.e. maths, sciences, engineering and biochemistry. Men at university would smoke pipes and wear smart clothes and brogues. Women at university would do the cooking and cleaning. Some attracive women could be given admin roles so that they can fall in love with research scientists who are working late on an important new offensive weapon. All computers will be banned from universities; blackboards and chalk will be used instead. These will be backed up by typewriters (used by women).
- The diplomatic service could be out-sourced to a call centre in Mumbai. Highly trained call centre workers would use a simple script that gave the caller the option of either capitulation or armageddon. The theme song from ‘Minder’ would be a nice relaxing tune whilst foreign governments were on hold. To provide an air of menace, PJ & Duncan’s ‘Lets Get Ready To Rumble’ could be substituted at times of increased tension.
Where Britain needed to initiate a negotiation, then the call centre could be used to contact foreign governments whilst they’re having their tea after a hard day’s work.
- The military-industrial complex would provide unlimited employment. The feckless and ne’re do wells could be employed in irradiated areas without the expense of shielding by issuing them with brand new ‘radio active proof’ shell suits.
- The polar regions could be used as testing grounds for the new warheads. This would speed up the melting of the polar ice-caps. Once the ice-caps had melted, scruffy long haired people wouldn’t be able to whinge about them receding anymore and there would be more room in the media for real, fact based, science articles.
- It would probably be best to keep the USA on side with this one.
